Keywords
property rights
fair share
modeled available groundwater
Groundwater Management Area 12
Post Oak Savannah GCD
Lost Pines GCD
Vista Ridge
socioeconomic impacts
desired future conditions
How to Cite
Abstract
Continued population growth, increased demands for water and declining water availability are statewide water concerns in Texas. The development and movement of water from where it is to where it is needed brings with it benefits to the receiving area and concerns for the area of origin. The Vista Ridge project serves as an on-point example and case study of such concerns and processes that can mitigate, in part, negative impacts that are informative to other Texans who will soon be facing similar pressures.. Impacts on the water levels in existing wells made the Vista Ridge Project a focus of significant public discussion in 2022, including Texas House and Senate interim session hearings. This paper spotlights groundwater management issues prominent in the Vista Ridge Project that will likely be of concern with other Texas groundwater projects in the near future. These issues involve well mitigation, significant impacts from groundwater production across groundwater conservation district boundaries, meaningful consideration of nine factors in Texas Water Code §36.108(d), the balance between limiting groundwater production, development of fair share doctrines, the role of the Texas Water Development Board in the
References
Atlantic Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission, 346 S.W.2d 801 (Tex. 1961).
Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District. (2021). Memo to Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District Board of Directors from Stephen Cast, Board President, Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Draft_-Explanatory_Report_Appendices-A-to-X-.pdf.
Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District. (2023). Rules of the Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District. https://brazosvalleygcd.org/files/?catid=293.
Coyote Lake Ranch LLC v. City of Lubbock, 498 W. W. 3d 53 (Tex. 2016).
Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Ground Water Consultants, LLC, & INTERA Incorporated. (2020). Presentation to GMA-12: S-7 Results for GAM 2018 and GAM 2020. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GMA12_Oct_22_GAM2020_comparison.pdf .
Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, INTERA Incorporated, & Ground Water Consultants, LLC. (2022). Desired Future Condition Explanatory Report for Groundwater Management Area 12. January 28, 2022. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/GMA_12_Explanatory-Report_Final_1-28-2022.pdf.
Douglas, E. (2021, August 2). San Antonio built a pipeline to rural Central Texas to increase its water supply. Now local landowners say their wells are running dry. The Texas Tribune. https://www.texastribune.org/2021/08/02/san-antonio-water-supply-rural-wells/.
Edwards Aquifer Auth. V. Day, 369 S. W. 3d 814 (Tex. 2012).
Ellis, J., Knight, J. E., White, J. T., Sneed, M., Hughes, J. D., Ramage, J. K., Braun, C. L., Teeple, A., Foster, L. K., Rendon, S. H., & Brandt, J. T. (2023). Hydrogeology, land-surface subsidence, and documentation of the Gulf Coast Land Subsidence and Groundwater-Flow (GULF) model, southeast Texas, 1897–2018 (Professional Paper 1877). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1877.
Groundwater Management Area 12. (2021). Groundwater Management Area 12 Meeting Minutes for January 15, 2021. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/GMA-12-Minutes-01.15.2021-Signed.pdf.
Houston & T.C. Ry. Co. v. East, 81 S.W. 279, 281 (Tex. 1904).
Texas House Committee on Natural Resources. (2022, August 24). House Committee on Natural Resources Hearing [Video]. https://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=46&clip_id=23448.
INTERA Incorporated. (2020, December 4). Desired Future Conditions Committee update [Presentation]. POSGCD DFC Committee Meeting. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DFC_meeting-Dec_4_final.pdf.
INTERA Incorporated. (2021a, January 15). Submission of S-10* for GMA 12 Consideration [Presentation]. GMA 12 Meeting. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/GMA_12_S-10_summary_final.pdf.
INTERA Incorporated. (2021b, February 12). GMA 12 Desired Future Conditions Presented to GMA 12 [Presentation] GMA 12 Meeting. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/GMA12_meeting_Feb_12_2021b.pdf.
INTERA Incorporated. (2021c, June 7). Update for GMA 12 Desired Future Conditions [Presentation]. POSGCD Board Meeting. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Agenda-Item-6.g-Board_meeting_June_7_202_v3.pdf.
Kirkle, S. R., Martinsson, L. K., Schlessinger, S. R., Ortiz, A. R., Fowler, P. L., Puig-Williams, V., Mazur, J. B., & Votteler, T. H. (2023). Commentary: 88th Texas State Legislature: Summaries of Water-Related Legislative Action. Texas Water Journal, 14(1), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v14i1.7167.
Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J. D., Banta, E. R., Provost, A. M., Niswonger, R. G., & Panday, S. (2021). MODFLOW 6 Modular Hydrologic Model (Version 6.2.1). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9FL1JCC.
Lost Pines Groundwater Conservation District. (2023). Rules of the Lost Pines Groundwater Conservation District. https://www.lostpineswater.org/191/District-Rules.
Mace, R. E., Petrossian, R., Bradley, R., & Mullican, W. F., III. (2006, May 18–19). A streetcar named desired future conditions – the new groundwater availability for Texas. State Bar of Texas, 7th Annual Changing Face of Water Rights in Texas, San Antonio, TX, United States. https://aquiferalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Desired-Future-Conditions-03-1_mace.pdf.
Mace, R. E., Petrossian, R., Bradley, R., Mullican, W. F., III, & Christian, L. (2008, May 8–9). A streetcar named desired future conditions (revised). State Bar of Texas, Changing Face of Water Rights in Texas, Bastrop, TX, United States. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/docs/Streetcar.pdf.
Pecos County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Williams, 271 S.W.2d 503, 505 (Tex. App. 1954)
Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District. (2021a, June 7). Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation Districts Board of Directors Meeting Minutes. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/June-7-2021-Board-Meeting-Minutes.pdf.
Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District. (2021b). Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District position paper on GMA 12 proposed DFCs for the 3rd joint planning cycle. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Position-Paper-on-GMA-12-Proposed-DFCs_13.pdf.
Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District. (2021c, June 24). POSGCD discussion regarding proposed desired future conditions. [Presentation] GMA 12 DFC Planning Meeting. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021_12_June_24_GMA12_v9-2.pdf.
Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District. (2023a). Rules of the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Approved-Rules-4-11-2023.pdf.
Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District. (2023b). GMA 12 Agenda & Minutes. https://posgcd.org/agendas-minutes/gma-12-agendas-minutes/.
Rubinstein, C., & Puig-Williams, V. (2023). Improving water planning in Texas: the critical but overlooked link between desired future conditions and the state water plan. Environmental Defense Fund. https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/documents/Improving%20Water%20Planning%20in%20Texas_0.pdf.
Terrill & Waldrop. (2020, November 10). Memo to Gary Westbrook, GM, POSGCD from Paul M. Terrill III.
Thompson, J. C., Kreitler, C. W., & Young, M. H. (2020). Exploring groundwater recoverability in Texas: maximum economically recoverable storage. Texas Water Journal, 11(1), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v11i1.7113.
Texas Water Development Board. (2022). 2022 State Water Plan. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/swp/2022/index.asp.
Texas Water Code § 36. (2023). https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.36.htm.
United States Code 33 § 1321. (2023). https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-33-navigation-and-navigable-waters/33-usc-sect-1321/.
White, J. T., Hunt, R. J., Fienen, M. N., & Doherty, J. E. (2020). Approaches to highly parameterized inversion: PEST++ version 5, a software suite for parameter estimation, uncertainty analysis, management optimization and sensitivity analysis (Techniques and Methods 7-C26). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm7C26.
Wise, S. (2021). Letter to Board of Directors Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District. https://posgcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Comments_Wise-to-BVGCD_DFCs-GMA12_2021_01_19.pdf.
Young, S., Jigmond, M., Jones, T., & Ewing, T. (2018). Groundwater availability model for central portion of the Sparta, Queen City, and Carrizo-Wilcox aquifers. Texas Water Development Board. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/models/gam/czwx_c/Updated_CWQCSP_GAM_vol1_all.pdf?d=15131.300000071526.
Young, S., Kushnereit, R., Donnelly, A., & Seifert, J. (2020). GMA 12 update to the groundwater availability model for the central portion of the Sparta, Queen City, and Carrizo-Wilcox aquifers: update to improve representation of the transmissive properties of the Simsboro Aquifer in the vicinity of the Vista Ridge well field. Texas Water Development Board. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/models/gam/czwx_c/PE_Report_GMA12_final_october_2020_merge.pdf?d=15131.300000071526.
Young, S., Kushnereit, R., White, J., & Beal, L. (2021). The future is here: comparing projected and actual impacts of Vista Ridge Project [Presentation]. Milam and Burleson Counties Groundwater Summit, 2021. August 12, 2021. https://vimeo.com/showcase/7469202.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Steve Young, Carlos Rubinstein, Russell Johnson