Documentation of a recharge-discharge water budget and main-streambed recharge volumes, and fundamental evaluation of groundwater tracer studies for the Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2014). Cover photo: Lake Buchanan, Burnet County. ©2014. Mark Lee, Lower Colorado River Authority.
PDF

Keywords

Edwards Aquifer
Barton Springs
water budget

How to Cite

Slade Jr., Raymond Maurice. 2014. “Documentation of a Recharge-Discharge Water Budget and Main-Streambed Recharge Volumes, and Fundamental Evaluation of Groundwater Tracer Studies for the Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards Aquifer”. Texas Water Journal 5 (1). College Station, Texas:12-23. https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v5i1.6988.

Abstract

Data and information reveal that the Edwards Aquifer between Lady Bird Lake (the Colorado River) in Austin, Texas and the "groundwater divide" near Kyle, Texas discharges to 2 major springs: Barton Springs and Cold and Deep Eddy Springs. The long-term mean discharges for the springs are 51 cubic feet per second and 5.5 cubic feet per second, respectively. The source for Cold and Deep Eddy Springs probably represents Dry Creek in the Rollingwood, Texas area and a small amount of recharge water from Barton Creek.

Additional springflow, which periodically discharges from the lower reach of Barton Creek immediately upstream from Barton Springs, varies from zero when Barton Springs is flowing about 50 cubic feet per second to about 5 cubic feet per second during extreme high-flow conditions at Barton Springs. Two streamflow gain-loss studies on the Colorado River document any other discharges from the Edwards Aquifer to the Colorado River to be nonexistent or minor.

A recharge-discharge water budget for a 32-month period reveals that the total discharge from Barton Springs, Cold and Deep Eddy Springs, the lower reach of Barton Creek, and groundwater pumpage is about 3% less than the surface recharge—a value within the potential error of the measurements. Additionally, for the budget period, recharge within the main channels of the 6 major streams crossing the recharge area account for a minimum of 75% of total recharge. Therefore, long-term recharge within the recharge area from overland flow or tributaries to the main channels represents a maximum of 25% of total recharge, a value equivalent to a mean depth of 2.1 inches per year over the 90-square-mile recharge area, or no more than 6.6% of the long-term mean precipitation of 32 inches per year over the recharge area.

Citation: Slade RM Jr. 2014. Documentation of a recharge-discharge water budget and main streambed recharge volumes, and fundamental evaluation of groundwater tracer studies for the Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer. Texas Water Journal. 5(1):12-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v5i1.6988.

https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v5i1.6988
PDF

References

Brune G. 1975. Major and historical springs of Texas [Inter¬net]. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Development Board. 94 p. Report 189. Available from: https://www.twdb.state. tx.us/publications/reports/numbered_reports/doc/R189/ Report189.asp

Brune G, Duffin GL. 1983. Occurrence, availability, and quality of ground water in Travis County, Texas [Internet]. Austin (Texas): Texas Department of Water Resources. 219 p. Report 276. Available from: http://www.twdb.state. tx.us/publications/reports/numbered_reports/doc/R276/ R276.pdf

Hauwert NM, Johns DA, Sansom JW, Aley TJ. 2004. Ground¬water tracing of the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer, southern Travis and northern Hays Counties, Texas. Austin (Texas): Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conser¬vation District and the City of Austin Watershed Protec¬tion and Development Review Department, 100 p. and appendices.

Slade RM Jr, Ruiz LM, Slagle DL. 1985. Simulation of the flow system of Barton Springs and associated Edwards Aquifer in the Austin area, Texas [Internet]. Denver (Colorado): U.S. Geological Survey. 49 p. Water Resources Investiga¬tions Report 85-4299. Prepared in cooperation with the city of Austin. Available from: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/ pubs/wri/wri854299

Slade RM Jr, Dorsey ME, Stewart SL. 1986. Hydrology and water quality of the Edwards aquifer associated with Barton Springs in the Austin area, Texas [Internet]. Denver (Colorado): U.S. Geological Survey. 117 p. Water Resources Investigations Report 86-4036. Prepared in cooperation with the city of Austin. Available from: http:// pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri864036

[SRI] Southwest Research Institute. 2009. Update of ground¬water availability model for Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer utilizing the Modflow-DCM code [Internet]. San Antonio (Texas): Southwest Research Institute. SwRI Project 20-14074. Prepared for Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District and Texas Water Development Board. Available from: http://www. bseacd.org/uploads/AquiferScience/HR_DCM_SWRI_ Report_2009.pdf

[TBWE] Texas Board of Water Engineers. 1959. Summary of peak flood flow measurements and other measurements of stream discharge in Texas at points other than gaging stations [Internet]. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Devel¬opment Board. 255 p. Bulletin 5807 C. Available from: http://www.twdb.state.tx.us/publications/reports/bulle¬tins/doc/B5807C.pdf

[TBWE] Texas Board of Water Engineers. 1960. Channel gain and loss investigations [Internet]. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Development Board. 270 p. Bulletin 5807 D. Available from: http://www.twdb.texas.gov/publications/ reports/bulletins/doc/B5807D.pdf

Woodruff CW Jr. 1984. Water budget analysis for the area contributing recharge to the Edwards aquifer, Barton Springs segment. In: Woodruff CM Jr, Slade RM Jr, editors. Hydrogeology of the Edwards Aquifer-Barton Springs segment, Travis and Hays Counties. Austin (Texas): Austin Geological Society Guidebook. Number 6, p. 36-42.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2014 Raymond M. Slade, Jr.