Abstract
In 2007, the 80th Texas Legislature enacted Senate Bill 3 on the 140th and last day of session. This bill was the third far-reaching piece of water legislation after Senate Bill 1 passed in 1997 and Senate Billl 2 passed in 2001. Collectively, these bills changed how Texas plans for future water needs, regulates groundwater, promotes conservation, studies the need for environmental flows balanced with population needs, and establishes environmental flow standards for Texas’ rivers, bays, and estuaries. Senate Bill 3 created a process through which scientists, stakeholders, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality set environmental flow standards. Over 12 years have passed since Senate Bill 3 became law, allowing us to consider the efficacy of the enabling legislation and the resulting rules. In short, identifying and securing water for the environment has been difficult due to little if any unallocated water in the state’s river basins and limitations in Senate Bill 3 and Texas Water Code. We identified seven options for the stakeholders and the state to consider to increase the protection of environmental flows while respecting private property rights: (1) protecting water-right owners that participate in forbearance agreements from cancellation, (2) pursuing cancellations and affirming abandonments, (3) requiring that cancelled or abandoned water be set-aside to meet environmental flow standards, (4) modernizing how surface-water use and diversions are tracked, (5) requiring water rights holders to demonstrate the pursuit of other water supplies before suspending environmental flows, (6) studying ways how environmental flows can co-exist and be protected within a prior-appropriation system, and (7) studying how dedications of water under existing water rights can be considered for tax credit or deductions so as to further incentivize transactions for environmental benefit. If implemented, these options could allow Texas and Texans to more closely achieve the desired outcomes hoped for from Senate Bill 3.
References
Alexander K. 2019. The rise of water conservation and efforts to Protect environmental flows. Water Resources IMPACT. 21(4):16-19. Available from: https://aquadoc.typepad.com/files/awras_awras0419final.pdf.
Caroom DG, Maxwell SM. 2018. Chapter 9: Surface water rights permitting. In: Sahs M, editor. Essentials of Texas water resources. Austin (Texas): State Bar of Texas. p. 9-1–9-15.
Ducks Unlimited, Texas A&M University Corpus Christi Harte Research Institute, The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment, The Nature Conservancy, National Wildlife Federation. 2019. Texas environmental flows initiative final report. Austin (Texas): Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Available from: https://gato-docs.its.txstate.edu/jcr:5580662d-e40c-439c-9b76-687f0abc862d.
Dates of Interest 86th Legislature. 2019. Austin (Texas): Texas Legislative Commission. Available from: https://lrl.texas.gov/whatsNew/client/index.cfm/2018/8/7/Dates-of-Interest-for-the-86th-Regular-Session.
Gervais B. 2015. Primer on Texas water law. Houston (Texas): Olson & Olson, LLP. 10 p. Available from: http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/thester/courses/Environmental%20Law%20in%20Oil%20and%20Gas/Primer%20on%20Texas%20Water%20Law%20by%20Gervais.pdf.
Hess MJ. 2005. Instream flows – an environmental perspective of Texas laws. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Law Institute. 15 p. Available from: https://texaswater.tamu.edu/readings/ef_plicy/instreamflows.hess.pdf.
Hicks T. 2011. An interpretation of the internal revenue code and treasury regulations supporting the tax deductibility of the voluntary charitable contribution in perpetuity of a partial interest in an appropriative or riparian water right transferred instream for conservation purposes (with an emphasis on Calfornia water law). West Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. 17(2):93-162. Available from: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol17/iss2/1/.
King MA. 2004. Getting our feet wet: An introduction to water trusts. Harvard Environmental Law Review. 28(2):495-534. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/helr28&div=15.
Landry CJ. 1998. Saving our streams through water markets: a practical guide. Bozeman (Montana): Public Economy Research Center.
Nott R. 2020 Jan 26. New Mexico budget holds funding that could alleviate water problem. Santa Fe New Mexican. Available from: https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/legislature/new-mexico-budget-holds-funding-that-could-alleviate-water-problem/article_4875117a-3ef5-11ea-abf3-6f7d87f2b3a5.html.
Puig-Williams V. 2013. Implementing SB 3: adopting environmental flows in Texas. Austin (Texas): University of Texas School of Law. Available from: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/27572/sb3_environmental_flows.pdf.
Roach KA. 2013. Texas water wars: How politics and scientic uncertainty influenced environmental flow decision-making in the lone Star state. Biodiversity and Conservation. 22:545-565. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0443-2.
Rochelle MC. 2007. From the capitol: the 80th Texas Legislature. Austin (Texas): Lloyd Gosselink Blevins Rochelle & Townsend, P.C.
Szeptycki LF, Forgie J, Hook E, Lorick K, Womble P. 2015. Environmental water rights transfers: a review of state laws. Stanford (California): Water in the West for the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Available from: https://waterinthewest.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/WITW-WaterRightsLawReview-2015-FINAL.pdf.
Szeptycki L, Pilz D, O’Connor R, Gordon B. 2018. Environmental water transactions in the Colorado River Basin: a closer look. Stanford (California): Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. Available from: https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:tx230zb7767/2018%20Woods%20Water%20Scorecard%20v13%20FINAL%20WEB.pdf.
[TCEQ] Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2003. Marked agenda January 23, 2003 TCEQ. Austin (Texas): Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Available from: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/comm_exec/agendas/comm/marked/2003/030123.html.
[TCEQ] Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2019. Chapter 303 – Operation of the Rio Grande. Austin (Texas): Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 4 p. Available from: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/legal/rules/rules/pdflib/303a.pdf.
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 5.506. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.5.htm
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 11.02(16). 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 11.02362. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 11.0237. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm.
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 11.024. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm#11.3271.
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 11.027. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm.
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 11.031. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm.
[TWC] Texas Water Code § 11.139. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm.
[TWC] Texas Water Code Chapter 11 subchapter E. 2019. Available from: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/WA/htm/WA.11.htm.
[TWDB] Texas Water Development Board. 2017. Water for Texas. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Development Board. 150 p. Available from: https://www.twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/swp/2017/index.asp.
[TWDB] Texas Water Development Board. 2008. Texas instream flow studies: technical overview. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Development Board. Report 369. 147 p. Available from: https://www.twdb.texas.gov/publications/reports/numbered_reports/doc/R369_InstreamFlows.pdf.
Wells H, Barron Bradsby C. 2018. Chapter 11: Environmental flows. In: Sahs M, editor. Essentials of Texas water resources. Austin (Texas): State Bar of Texas. p. 11-1–11-29.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Robert E. Mace