Dams are coming down, but not always by choice: the geography of Texas dams, dam failures, and dam removals
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020). Cover Photo: Tres Palacios River at FM 1468 near Clemville, Texas. ©2019 Ed Rhodes, TWRI.
PDF

Keywords

Dams
Texas
Dam Removal
Dam Failure

How to Cite

Dascher, Erin D., and Kimberly Meitzen. 2020. “Dams Are Coming Down, But Not Always by Choice: The Geography of Texas Dams, Dam Failures, and Dam Removals”. Texas Water Journal 11 (1). College Station, Texas:89-129. https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v11i1.7092.

Abstract

This study examines spatial and temporal trends in Texas dams, dam failures, and dam removals. Dams were examined from a state-wide perspective and within 10 major river basins that collectively account for over 80% of all dams in the state. The state-scale and basin-scale analysis revealed similar patterns of dam occurrence, however there was greater variation in the patterns observed in both the purpose of dams and the timing for when most of the storage was created in each basin. Climate factors, mainly precipitation, influenced dam location. Population was not directly measured in this study but was an obvious influence on the spatial distribution of dams and their functions. While new dams are being built in Texas to secure future water supplies, documented dam incidents/failures have occurred in 15 of the 23 major river basins in Texas, with 328 total instances occurring since 1900. As the number of newly constructed dams and dam failures continue to grow across the state, so should the number of planned dam removals. Between 1983 and 2016, 50 dams have been removed across the state. The purpose for the majority of removals was to eliminate liability concerns associated with aging dams. Future dam removals will likely continue to occur based on the number of older, smaller dams with potential liability concerns. As Texas’ dam infrastructure continues to age, dam removal is a practical management option for mitigating potential dam-related hazards and improving the connectivity and ecological function of the river systems.

Citation: Dascher ED, Meitzen K. 2020. Dams are coming down, but not always by choice: the geograph of Texas dams, dam failures, and dam removals. Texas Water Journal. 11(1):89-129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v11i1.7092.

https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v11i1.7092
PDF

References

-Year Normals. 2012–. Corvallis (Oregon): PRISM Climate Group. [Updated 2019; accessed 2014 April 5]. Available from: https://prism.oregonstate.edu/normals/.

[ARDRD] American Rivers Dam Removal Database. 1912– 2019. Version 7. Washington (District of Colubia): Ameri-can Rivers. [Updated 2020 Feb 12; accessed 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://figshare.com/articles/_/5234068.

[ASCE] American Society of Civil Engineers Texas Section. 2017. Report card for Texas’ infrastructure. Austin (Tex-as): American Society of Civil Engineers Texas Section. 47 p. Available from: https://www.texasce.org/wp-content/ uploads/2018/11/FullReport-TX_2017.pdf.

Ashley ST, Ashley WS. 2008. Flood fatalities in the United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 47(3):805-818. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1175/ 2007JAMC1611.1.

Association of Dam Safety Officials. 2018. Dam ownership fact sheet. Topic: Earth dam failures. Lexington (Ken-tucky): Association of Dam Safety Officials. Available from: https://damsafety.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/ files/Eart%20Dam%20Failure%20Fact%20Sheet%20 2018.pdf.

Bednarek AT. 2001. Undamming rivers: a review of the ecolog¬ical impacts of dam removal. Environmental Management. 27(6):803- . Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s002670010189.

Bellmore, JR, Duda JJ, Craig LS, Green SL, Torgersen CH, Collins MJ, Vittum K. 2017. Status and trends of the dam removal research in the United States. WIREs Water. 4(5): e1164. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ wat2.1164.

Benner R, Barnett A, Olivero A. 2014. North Carolina’s fresh¬water resilience. Durham (North Carolina): The Nature Conservancy. 33 p. Available from: https://www.conserva-tiongateway.org/ConservationByGeography/NorthAmer¬ica/UnitedStates/edc/Documents/ED_TNC_NC_Fresh-waterResilience.pdf.

Black & Veatch. 2019. Dunlap spillgate hinge inspection report. Seguin (Texas) Guadalupe Blanco River Authority. 17 p. Black & Veatch project no. 400368. Available from: https://gvlakes.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Dun-lap-Spillgate-Hinge-Inspection-Report.pdf.

Brusuelas C. 2018 Aug 26. A history of Cape’s Dam. San Mar¬cos Daily Record. Available from: https://www.sanmarcos¬record.com/opinions/history-cape’s-dam.

Buchele M. 2013a Oct 17. Aging dams, booming growth, and the search for solutions. StateImpact. Available from: https://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2013/10/17/aging-dams-booming-growth-and-the-search-for-solutions/.

Buchele M. 2013b Oct 15. How hundreds of ‘significant hazard’ dams escape state inspection in Texas. StateIm-pact. Available from: https://stateimpact.npr.org/ texas/2013/10/15/how-hundreds-of-significant-haz¬ard-dams-escape-state-inspection/.

Buchele M. 2013c Oct 16. Want to learn about a nearby dam? In Texas, some questions are off limits. StateImpact. Avail¬able from: https://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2013/10/16/ want-to-learn-about-a-nearby-dam-in-texas-some-ques¬tions-are-off-limits/.

Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Lopez-Li¬ma M. 2018. A new freshwater bivalve species of the genus Cyclonaias from Texas (Unionidae: Amblemi¬nae: Quadrulini). The Nautilus. 132(2):45-50. Avail¬able from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ Manuel_Lopes-Lima/publication/326059009_A_new_ freshwater_bivalve_species_of_the_genus_Cyclona¬ias_from_Texas_Unionidae_Ambleminae_Quadrulini/ links/5b35e7664585150d23e09ced/A-new-freshwater-bi¬valve-species-of-the-genus-Cyclonaias-from-Texas-Union¬idae-Ambleminae-Quadrulini.pdf.

Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Karatayev VA, May ME, Bennett DL, Cook MJ. 2011a. Biogeography and conservation of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Texas: pat¬terns of diversity and threats. Diversity and Distributions. 17(30): 393-407. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1472-4642.2011.00753.x.

Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Karatayev VA, May ME, Ben¬nett DL, Cook MJ. 2011b. Endemic species: Con¬tribution to community uniqueness, effect of habitat alteration, and conservation priorities. Biological Con¬servation. 144(1):155-165. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.010.

[CBS/AP] CBS and the Associated Press. 2020 May 21. Mich¬igan dam failures force 10,000 to evacuate and could leave one city under 9 feet of water. CBS News. Available from: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/michigan-dam-fail¬ures-state-of-emergency-10000-evacuated-flooding/.

[CGIAR-CSI] CGIAR-CSI Global-Aridity and Global-PET Database. 2007–2019. Internet: CGIAR-CSI. [Updated 2008; accessed 2019 July 22]. Available from: https://cgia¬rcsi.community/data/global-aridity-and-pet-database/.

Chin A, Laurencio LR, Martinez AE. 2008. The hydro¬logic importance of small- and medium-sized dams: examples from Texas. The Professional Geogra¬pher 60(2):238-251. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1080/00330120701836261.

Clark BT. 2009. River restoration in the American West: assessing variation in the outcomes of policy change. Soci-ety & Natural Resources. 22(5):401-416. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920801914528.

DamFailuresPIR9267. 1900–. Austin (Texas): Texas Commis¬sion on Environmental Quality. [Updated 2019; accessed 2020 Aug 19] Retrieved through Open Records Request: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/agency/data/records-services/ reqinfo.html.

Dam Removals. 1983–. Austin (Texas): Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. [Updated 2015; accessed 2016 Aug 08]. Retrieved by email request from Warren D. Sam¬uelson Manager, Dam Safety Section, TCEQ; warren.sam-uelson@tceq.texas.gov.

Dams.gdb. 1800–. Austin (Texas): Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. [Updated 2014; accessed 2014 Sep 05]. Retrieved through email request sent to Morgan Dean, Dam Safety Section, Critical Infrastructure Divi¬sion, TCEQ; morgan.dean@tceq.texas.gov.

Dascher ED, Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Ford DF, Schwalb AN. 2018. Distribution of unionid freshwater mussels and host fishes in Texas: a study of broad-scale spatial patterns across basins and a strong climate gradient. Hydrobiologia. 80(1):315-331. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10750-017-3168-5.

Doyle MW, Stanley EH, Harbor JM. 2003. Channel adjust¬ments following two dam removals in Wisconsin. Water Resources Research. 39(1):1-15. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001714.

Doyle MW, Harbor JM, Stanley EH. 2003a. Toward policies and decision-making for dam removal. Environmental Management. 31(4):453-465. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1007/s00267-002-2819-z.

[DRIP] Dam Removal Information Portal. 2016–. Reston (Virginia): United States Geologic Survey. [Updated 2016; accessed 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://www.sci¬encebase.gov/drip/.

Duchemin M. 2009. Water, power, and tourism: Hover Dam and the making of the New West. 86(4):60-78. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.library.ewu.edu/sta¬ble/40495234.

Duda JJ, Wieferich DJ, Bristol RS, Bellmore JR, Hutchison VB, Vittum KM, Craig L, Warrick JA. 2016. Dam Remov¬al Information Portal (DRIP)—a map-based resource link¬ing scientific studies and associated geospatial information about dam removals. Reston (Virginia): United States Geological Survey. 23 p. Open-File Report 2016-1132. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161132.

Elverum KA, Smalley T. 2012. The drowning machine. St. Paul (Minnesota): Minnesota Department of Natural Resourc¬es. 2 p. Available from: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/educa-tion_safety/safety/boatwater/drowningmachine.pdf.

Erős T, Campbell Grant EH. 2015. Unifying research on the fragmentation of terrestrial and aquatic habitats: patch-es, connectivity and the matrix in riverscapes. Freshwater Biology. 60(8):1487-1501. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1111/fwb.12596.

Folger P, Cody BA, Carter NT. 2013. Drought in the United States: causes and issues for congress. Washington (Dis-trict of Columbia): Congressional Research Service. 36 p. RL34580. Available from: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/ RL34580.pdf.

[FWS] Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Endangered and Threated Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Texas Hornshell. Washington, District of Columbia: Department of the Interior; [Accessed 2019 Aug 10]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ FR-2018-02-09/pdf/2018-02672.pdf.

[GBRA] Common Misconceptions. n.d. Seguin (Texas): Gua¬dalupe Blanco River Authority. Available from: https:// gvlakes.com/common-misconceptions/.

Getschow G. 2015 Dec 12. The dam called trouble. The Dallas Morning News. Available from: http:// interactives.dallasnews.com/2015/lewisville-dam/#_ g a=2.48353318.1459774468 .1558914694- 1934865605.1558914694.

Gilman S. 2016 Apr 11. This will be the biggest dam-re¬moval project in history. National Geograph¬ic. Available from: http://news.nationalgeographic. com/2016/04/160411-klamath-glen-canyon-dam-remov¬al-video-anniversary/.

Gosnell H, Kelly EC. 2010. Peace on the river? Social-eco¬logical restoration and large dam removal in the Klamath Basin, USA. Water Alternatives. 3(2):361-383. Available from: http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/all-doc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/98-a3-2-21/file.

Gottgens J. 2009. Impact of the removal of the Secor Road Dam on the fish community structure and composition in the Ottawa River, Ohio. Toledo (Ohio): Toledo Metro¬politan Area Council of Governments. 16 p. Final Report ‐ Project 06(h) EPA 10. Available from: https://www. utoledo.edu/commissions/river/pdfs/secor%20dam%20 removal%20report%20November%202009.pdf.

Grabowski ZJ, Chang H, Granek EL. 2018. Fracturing dams, fractured data: empirical trends and characteristics of exist¬ing and removed dams in the United States. River Research and Applications. 34(6):1-12. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1002/rra.3283.

Graf WL. 1999. Dam nation: A geographic census of Ameri¬can dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts. Water Resources Research. 35(4):1305-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900016.

Graf WL. 2005. Geomorphology and American dams: The scientific, social, and economic context. Geomorphology 71(1–2):3-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geomorph.2004.05.005.

Graf WL. 2006. Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American Rivers. Geomor¬phology 79(3–4):336-360. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.022.

Graf WL, Boland JJ, Dixon DA, Downs TC, Kraeuter JJ, Sos¬cia ML, Wegner DL, Williams PB, Wingo CS, Zeizel EP. 2002. Dam removal: Science and decision making. Wash¬ington (District of Columbia): The H. John Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment. 235 p. Avail¬able from: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/01/273439.pdf.

Grant GE, Lewis SL. 2015. The remains of the dam: What have we learned from 15 years of US dam removal? Engineer¬ing Geology for Society and Territory. 3:31-35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09054-2_7.

Green C. 2019 Apr 9. Uncertain future for Cape’s Dam. The University Star. Available from: https://universitystar. com/28919/news/uncertain-future-for-capes-dam/.

Hardy TB, Raphelt N. 2015. Effects of changing height of Cape’s Dam on recreation, Texas wild rice and fountain darter habitat in the San Marcos River, Texas. San Marcos (Texas): City of San Marcos. 36 p. Available from: http:// www.sanmarcostx.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3237/ Capes-Dam-Removal-Study-PDF.

H.B. 677, 83rd Legislature, 83rd Session (Texas 2013). Avail¬able from: https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History. aspx?LegSess=83R&Bill=HB677.

Henry T. 2013 Nov 5. How Prop 6 assed, and what’s up next for water projects in Texas. StateImpact. Available from: https://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2013/11/05/texas-wa¬ter-fund-passes/.

Hershaw E. 2011 Dec 9. Dams are Coming Down, But Not in Texas. Reporting Texas. Available from: http://reporting¬texas.com/dams-come-down-around-u-s-but-not-in-tex¬as/.

Hoenke KM, Kumar M, Batt L. 2014. AGIS based approach for prioritizing dams for potential removal. 64:27-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.009.

Holden E. 2020a May 20. Michigan: thousand evacuated after ‘catastrophic’ dam failures. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/20/ michigan-dams-break-thousands-evacuated-floods.

Holden E. 2020b May 20. Michigan: threat of toxic con¬tamination looks after dam failures trigger flooding. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian. com/us-news/2020/may/20/michigan-flooding-dam-tox¬ic-contamination-threat.

Howells RG, Neck RW, Murray HD. 1996. Freshwater Mus¬sels of Texas. Austin (Texas): Texas Parks and Wildlife Press. 224 p.

[ICOLD] International Commission on Large Dams. 2007. Dams & the world’s water. International Commission on Large Dams. Available from: https://www.icold-cigb.org/ GB/publications/others.asp.

Inoue K, Harris JL, Robertson CR, Johnson NA, Randklev CR. 2019. A comprehensive approach uncovers hidden diversity in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) with the description of a novel species. Cladistics. 36(1):88- 113. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12386.

Jager HI, Chandler JA, Lepla KB, Van Winkle W. 2001. A Theoretical Study of River Fragmentation by Dams and its Effects on White Sturgeon Populations. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 60: 347–361. Available from: https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.ewu.edu/10.1023/A:1011036127663.

Karatayev AY, Miller TD, Burlakova LE. 2012. Longterm changes in unionid assemblages in the Rio Grande, one of the World’s top 10 rivers at risk. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems. 22(2):206-219. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2226.

Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Miller TD, Perrelli MF. 2018. Reconstructing historical range and population size of an endangered mollusc: long-term decline of Popenaias popeii in the Rio Grande, Texas. Hydrobiologia. 2018:333-349. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015- 2551-3.

Keel J. 2008. An audit report on the Dam Safety Program at the Commission on Environmental Quality. Austin (Tex-as): Texas State Auditor’s Office. 71 p. Report No. 08-032. Available from: https://www.sao.texas.gov/Reports/ Main/08-032.pdf.

Kellar B. 2017. More than $670 million approved for Low¬er Bois d'Arc Reservoir. Herald Banner. Available from: https://www.ntmwd.com/670-million-approved-lower-bois-darc-reservoir/.

Kern EW, Hotchkiss RH, Ames DP. 2015. Introducing a low-head dam fatality database and internet information portal. Journal of the American Water Resources Asso¬ciation. 51(5):1453-1459. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1111/jawr.12289.

Kern EW. 2014. Public safety at low-head dams: fatality data¬base and physical model of staggered deflector retrofit alternative [thesis]. [Provo (Utah)]: Brigham Young Uni¬versity. Available from: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ etd/3984/.

Kuby MJ, Fagan WF, ReVelle CS, Graf WL. 2005. A mul¬tiobjective optimization model for dam removal: an example trading off salmon passage with hydropower and water storage in the Willamette basin. Advances in Water Resources. 28(8):845-855. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.12.015.

MacFarlane A. 2015 Dec 31. Goliath: The deadliest U.S. storm system of 2015. The Weather Channel. Available from: https://weather.com/news/news/goliath-deadli¬est-storm-of-2015.

Mader H, Maier C. 2008. A method for prioritizing the rees¬tablishment of river continuity in Austrian rivers. Hyd¬robiologia. 609:277-288. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1007/s10750-008-9406-0.

Magilligan FJ, Graber BE, Nislow KH, Chipman JW, Sned¬don CS, Fox CA. 2016. River restoration by dam remov¬al: enhancing connectivity at watershed scales. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 4: p.000108 Available from: http://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000108.

Major River Basins. 2014. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Devel¬opment Board. [Updated 2014; accessed 2016 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.twdb.texas.gov/mapping/gis¬data.asp.

Marks M. 2013 Nov 26. If rains refill reservoirs, can Tex¬as’ dams hold up?. StateImpact. Available from: https:// stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2013/11/26/if-rains-refill-reser¬voirs-can-texas-dams-hold-up/.

Martin EH. 2018. Assessing and prioritizing barriers to aquatic connectivity in the Eastern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 55(2):1-10. Avail¬able from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12694.

Martin EH, Apse CD. 2013. Chesapeake fish passage prior¬itization: an assessment of dams in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Boston (Massachusetts): The Nature Conser¬vancy, Eastern Division Conservation Science. 114 p. Available from: https://easternbrooktrout.org/resources/ science-publications/chesapeake-fish-passage-prioritiza¬tion-an-assessment-of-dams-in-the-chesapeake-bay-water¬shed.

Martin EH, Apse CD. 2011. Northeast aquatic connectivity: an assessment of dams on northeastern rivers. Brunswick (Maine): The Nature Conservancy, Easter Freshwater Program. 102 p. Available from: https://rcngrants.org/ sites/default/files/final_reports/NEAquaticConnectivity_ Report.pdf.

McCann MW. 2018. Dam failures in the U.S. Stanford (Cali¬fornia): National Performance of Dams Program, Depart¬ment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University. 11 p. NPDP-01 V1. Available from: http:// npdp.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/reports/npdp_dam_ failure_summary_compilation_v1_2018.pdf.

McKay SK, Cooper AR, Diebel MW, Elkins D, Oldford G, Roghair C, Wieferich D. 2017. Informing watershed con¬nectivity barrier prioritization decisions: a synthesis. Riv¬er Research and Applications. 33(6):847-862. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3021.

Montagne M, Jobs J. 2016 Jan 22. Ottine Dam Removal Will Benefit Fish and Wildlife in San Marcos River. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Southwest Region. Avail¬able from: https://www.fws.gov/news/ShowNews.cfm?_ ID=35953.

[NID] National Inventory of Dams. 2013–. Washinton (District of Columbia): United States Army Corps of Engineers. [Updated 2020 Jan; accessed 2020 Aug 06]. Available from: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/nation¬al-inventory-of-dams.

[NHD] National Hydrography Dataset. 1999–. Version 2.3. Reston (Virginia): United States Geologic Survey. [Updat¬ed 2020; accessed 2017 May 10]. Available from: https:// gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/.

[NOAA] State of the climate: national climate report for December 2015. 2016. Asheville (North Carolina): NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information; [Accessed 2019 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www. ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/201512.

[NWS] National Weather Service. 2000. Flash floods: where they occur. Silver Spring (Maryland): National Weather Service; [Accessed 2019 Aug 10]. Available from: https:// www.floodsafety.com/media/pdfs/national/Flashfloodna¬tional.pdf.

Perica S, Pavlovic S, St. Laurent M, Trypaluk C, Unruh D, Wilhite O. 2018. NOAA Atlas 14 precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States. Volume 11 Version 2.0: Texas. Silver Spring (Maryland): National Oceanic and Atmo¬spheric Administration. p.283. Available from: https:// www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/PF_documents/Atlas14_Vol¬ume11.pdf.

Petts GE, Gurnell AM. 2005. Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directions. Geomorphology. 71(1–2):27-47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geomorph.2004.02.015.

Poff L N, Hart DD. 2002. How Dams Vary and Why It Matters for the Emerging Science of Dam Removal. BioScience. 52(8):659-668. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0659:HDVAWI]2.0. CO;2.

Randklev CR, Lundeen BJ, Howells RG, Kennedy RG. 2010. Habitat preference and first account of a living popula¬tion of Texas Fawnsfoot, Truncilla macrodon (Bivalvia: Unionidae), in the Brazos River, Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist. 55(2):297-298. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1894/JS-31.1.

Randklev CR, Tsakiris ET, Johnson MS, Skorupski J, Burlako¬va LE, Groce J, Wilkins N. 2013a. Is False Spike, Quadru¬la mitchelli (Bivalvia: Unionidae), extinct? First account of a very-recently deceased individual in over thirty years. The Southwestern Naturalist. 58(2):268-273. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909-58.2.247.

Randklev CR, Johnson MS, Tsakiris ET, Groce J, Wilkins N. 2013b. Status of the freshwater mussel (Unionidae) com¬munities of the mainstem of the Leon River, Texas. Aquat¬ic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 23(3):390-404. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ aqc.2340.

Reinhardt BH. 2011. Drowned Towns in the Cold War West: Small communities and federal water projects. Western Historical Quarterly. 42(2):149-172. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/westhistquar.42.2.0149.

Richter BD, Braun DP, Mendelson MA, Master LL. 1997. Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology. 11(5):1081-1093. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96236.x.

Reisner M. 1986. Cadillac Desert: The American West and its disappearing water. New York (New York): Viking. 582 p.

Rollins B. 2015 Sep 1. Future of Cape’s Dam, Thompson’s Island on San Marcos council agenda. San Marcos Mer¬cury. Available from: http://smmercury.com/2015/09/01/ future-of-capes-dam-thompsons-islands-on-san-marcos-council-agenda/.

Rubinstein C. 2015. Texas water policy appendix: the weather. Texas Water Journal. 6(1):121-135. Available from: https:// journals.tdl.org/twj/index.php/twj/article/view/7033.

Sadasivam N. 2019 Apr 1. Dammed to fail. The Texas Observer. Available from: https://www.texasobserver.org/ dammed-to-fail/.

Sansom A. 2008. Water in Texas: an introduction. Austin (Tex¬as): University of Texas Press. 336 p.

[SARP] Southeast Aquatic Barrier Prioritization Tool. 2019. Southeast Aquatic Resource Partnership; [Accessed 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://connectivity.sarpdata. com/.

Scruggs B. 2019 Jun 3. USACE awards $39.1M contract for Lewisville Dam Safety Modification Project. Forth Worth (Texas): US Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District. Available from: https://www.swf.usace.army.mil/Media/ News-Releases/Article/1864995/usace-awards-391m-con-tract-for-lewisville-dam-safety-modification-project/.

Sharif HO, Jackson TL, Hossain MM, Zane D. 2015. Anal¬ysis of flood fatalities in Texas. Natural Hazards Review. 16(1):0401416. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000145.

Smith CH, Johnson NA, Inoue K, Doyle RD, Randklev CR. 2019. Integrative taxonomy reveals a new species of fresh¬water mussel, Potamilus streckersoni sp. nov. (Bivalvia: Unionidae): implications for conservation and manage¬ment. Systematics and Biodiversity. 17(4):331-348. Avail¬able from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2019.1607 615.

Souers Kober A. 2016 Apr 5. Could this be the world’s biggest dam removal? American Rivers. Available from: https:// www.americanrivers.org/2016/04/worlds-biggest-dam-re¬moval/.

Stanley EH, Doyle MW. 2003. Trading off: the ecological effects of dam removal. Frontiers in Ecological Envi¬ronments. 1(1):15-22. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0015:TOTEEO]2.0. CO;2.

[TCEQ] Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2006. Dam removal guidelines. Austin (Texas): Texas Commis¬sion on Environmental Quality. 6 p. GI-358. Available from: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/comm_ exec/pubs/gi/gi-358.pdf.

The Associated Press. 2015 May 30. U.S. storms, floods kill 29 people, 25 of them in Texas. Dow Jones Institu¬tional News. Available from: https://search.proquest. com/docview/2066635428?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2F¬sid%3Aprimo.

Thomas-Blate J. 2018 Feb 13. Dam good year for dam remov¬als in 2017. American Rivers. Available from: https:// www.americanrivers.org/2018/02/dam-removal-in-2017/.

Thorne B. 2016a Nov 17. San Marcos moves forward with Cape’s Dam removal. Community Impact Newspaper. Available from: https://communityimpact.com/austin/ san-marcos-buda-kyle/environment/2016/11/17/san-marcos-moves-forward-capes-dam-removal/.

Thorne B. 2016b Mar 16. San Marcos votes to remove Cape’s Dam. Community Impact Newspaper. Available from: https://communityimpact.com/austin/city-coun¬ty/2016/03/16/san-marcos-votes-remove-capes-dam/.

[TIGER] TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2016, nation, U.S., Cur¬rent State and Equivalent National. 2015–2016. Suitland (Maryland): United States Census Bureau. [Updated 2016 May; accessed 2016 Apr 06]. Available from: http://www2. census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2016/STATE/tl_2016_us_ state.zip.

Tschantz BA, Wright KR. 2011. Hidden dangers and public safety at low-head dams. ASDSO Journal of Dam Safe¬ty. 9(1):8-17. Available from: https://damsafety.org/ sites/default/files/TschantzWright_PublicSftyLowDams_ JDS2011_1.pdf.

[TWDB] Texas Water Development Board. 2012. Water for Texas 2012 State Water Plan. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Development Board. 314 p. Available from: https://www. twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/swp/2012/index.asp.

[TWDB] Texas Water Development Board. 2017. Water for Texas 2017 State Water Plan. Austin (Texas): Texas Water Development Board. 150 p. Available from: https://www. twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/swp/2017/index.asp.

[TWDB] TWDB Flood Programs. 2019. Austin (Texas): Tex¬as Water Development Board; [Accessed 2019 Nov 25]. Available from: http://www.twdb.texas.gov/flood/index. asp.

[U.S. Census] American Community Survey 1-year estimates. 2018. Suitland (Maryland): United States Census Bureau; [Accessed 2020 Jun 15] Available from: http://censusre-porter.org/profiles/31000US19100-dallas-fort-worth-ar¬lington-tx-metro-area/.

[U.S. Census] Quick Facts Austin city, Texas. 2019. Suitland (Maryland): United States Census Bureau; [Accessed 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/quick-facts/fact/table/austincitytexas/PST045219.

[USDM] United States Drought Monitor Tabular Data Archive. 2000–. [Updated 2000, accessed 2012 Sept 19]. Lincoln (Nebraska): The National Drought Mitigation Center. Available from: https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/ Data/DataTables.aspx.

[USGS] USGS Dam Removal Science Database. 2018–. Version 3. Reston (Virginia): United States Geological Survey. [Updated 2020 Jan 07, accessed 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/ item/5ace95e3e4b0e2c2dd1a688f.

[WCD] World Commission on Dams. 2000. Dams and devel¬opment: a new framework for decision making. Sterling (Virginia): Earthscan Publications Ltd. Available from: https://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/9126IIED.pdf.

Warren D. 2015 Dec 27. At least 11 died in Texas storms that spawned tornadoes. Associated Press. Available from: https:// web.archive.org/web/20160304070627/http://www.msn. com/en-us/news/us/tornadoes-sweep-through-dallas-ar¬ea-significant-damage/ar-BBnRlgz?ocid=spartanntp.

Williams J. 2016. The untold story of the Lower Colorado Riv¬er Authority. College Station (Texas): Texas A&M Univer¬sity Press. 320 p.

Winemiller K, Lujan NK, Wilkins RN, Snelgrove RT, Dube AM, Skow KL, Snelgrove AG. 2010. Status of freshwa¬ter mussels in Texas. College Station (Texas): Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources. Available from: https://nri.tamu.edu/media/1109/status_of_freshwater_ mussels_in_texas_tamu-irnr_05-2010_1.pdf.

Wofford JE, Gresswell RE, Banks MA. 2005. Influence of bar¬riers to movement on within watershed genetic variation of coastal cutthroat trout. Ecological Applications. 15(2):628- 637. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0095.

Wright KR, Earles TA, Kelly JM. 1995. Public safety at low-head dams. Denver (Colorado): Wright Water Engi¬neers, Inc. Available from: http://www.wrightwater.com/ assets/25-public-safety-at-low-head-dams.pdf .

Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, van Straaten O, Verchot LV. 2008. Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 126:67-80. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.014.

Zomer RJ, Bossio DA, Trabucco A, Yuanjie L, Gupta DC, V.P. Singh VP. 2007. Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in northern India. Colombo (Sri Lanka): International Water Management Institute. 50 p. Research Report 122. Available from: https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/ Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/PDF/PUB122/ RR122.pdf.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Erin D. Dascher, Kimberly Meitzen